Combinations versus permutations
Count sets and ordered sequences with consistent denominators.
10 minutes · intermediate · Original Poker4Quant lessonWhat you will learn
Choose between combinations and permutations and explain the factorial correction.
Prerequisites: Conditional draws
When order matters
Choosing a first and second card from n distinct cards without replacement gives n(n−1) ordered outcomes. For k positions, continue multiplying n(n−1)…(n−k+1). These are permutations of k cards.
If only the collection matters, each k-card set has k! orderings. Dividing by k! converts ordered sequences to unordered sets: C(n,k)=n!/[k!(n−k)!]. The factorial correction is justified by equal multiplicity, not by a rule to divide whenever a number looks too large.
Represent the same event consistently
There are 52×51 ordered two-card deals but C(52,2)=1326 unordered starting hands. A particular unordered pair appears in two ordered ways. The ratio describing its probability must use either both ordered counts or both unordered counts.
Sampling a uniform shuffled deck induces a uniform distribution on fixed-size unordered subsets. That lets us count sets without losing probability information. Grouping by hand category later does not make the categories equally likely.
Worked example
How many three-card subsets can a 6-card toy deck produce?
- Ordered draws count 6×5×4=120.
- Each three-card subset has 3×2×1=6 orderings.
- Divide 120 by 6.
There are C(6,3)=20 equally likely subsets under uniform drawing. Twenty is a count, not yet the probability of a particular event.
Common mistakes
- Using n^k when repeated cards are impossible.
- Dividing by k instead of k!.
- Combining ordered favorable outcomes with an unordered total.
Keep these ideas
- Order-sensitive sequences use falling products.
- Unordered fixed-size sets use combinations.
- Match conventions in numerator and denominator.