Likelihood ratios
Express evidence as a multiplier on prior odds rather than on probability.
11 minutes · intermediate · Original Poker4Quant lessonWhat you will learn
Convert prior probability to odds, apply a likelihood ratio and convert back.
Prerequisites: Bayes with a frequency table · Odds versus probability
Odds reveal the update structure
For two exhaustive states S and not-S with positive relevant probabilities, prior odds are p/(1−p). The likelihood ratio for evidence E is P(E|S)/P(E|not-S). Posterior odds equal prior odds multiplied by that ratio.
A ratio above one favors S, below one favors the alternative, and exactly one leaves the prior unchanged. This is a comparison of the same observed evidence under two states, not a comparison of P(S|E) with P(E|S).
Multiply odds, then normalize
If posterior odds are r, the posterior probability is r/(1+r). Multiplying the prior probability directly by a likelihood ratio generally gives the wrong answer and can even exceed one.
An infinite ratio caused by zero alternative likelihood needs careful support handling; if the evidence is possible under the other state and that state had positive prior, the two-state posterior can become one. A zero-over-zero ratio is undefined rather than decisive. Prefer the joint-probability calculation at boundaries.
Worked example
Prior strength probability is 20%. Evidence occurs with probability 90% when strong and 30% when weak. Update using odds.
- Prior odds are 0.20/0.80=1/4.
- The likelihood ratio is 0.90/0.30=3.
- Posterior odds become 3/4.
- Convert odds to probability: (3/4)/(1+3/4)=3/7.
Posterior strength is about 42.86%, not 60%. Evidence tripled the odds, not the probability.
Common mistakes
- Multiplying a probability by the likelihood ratio without renormalizing.
- Comparing likelihoods for different observed events.
- Calling an undefined boundary ratio infinite evidence.
Keep these ideas
- Evidence multiplies odds.
- Convert odds back through r/(1+r).
- Check zero-probability boundaries directly.